Wind turbine spacing

18/5/21
Reading of
min
Share this article
Author
No items found.
Subscribe to our newsletter
By subscribing, you accept our Privacy Policy.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Share this article

How far apart should wind turbines be placed?

After more than fifteen years participating in the planning and implementation of wind farm projects in Spain and despite the uncertainty experienced by renewable energies, such as wind energy, Environmental Ideas continue to be asked the same question over and over again: How far apart should wind turbines be placed? Our answer to this question is immediate because it is founded on our own experience in wind farms projects. However, it is not so simple when the question is: What are the regulations regarding wind turbine spacing? because there is a large volume of information on this matter. Therefore, in this post we will analyze different information regarding wind turbine spacing and alignment and current regulations.

Best Performances & Shadow Effect

Firstly, we will focus on the “Endesa Red Chair”. Óscar Alexis Monzón Alejandro in his project “Design of a 20 MW Wind Power Plant” indicates that the distance between wind turbines in the same row should not be less than the diameter of 2 rotors. He also states that the distance between wind turbines in different rows should always be greater than 8 diameters. The reason for these minimum distances is the importance to minimize the shadow effect of some wind turbines on others.

Therefore, here is our first finding: “Correct wind turbine spacing is important to avoid shadow effect”.

Dr. Charles Meneveau, a researcher at Johns Hopkins University (US), developed a model to calculate the optimal spacing between turbines to obtain the best performance in large wind farms. Using large-scale computer simulations and small-scale wind tunnels for 5 MW wind turbines concluded that The optimal spacing between the turbines should be approximately 15 times the diameter of the rotor.

The “Technical Applications Notebook No. 12” entitled “Wind power plants of the ABB company” indicates that the wind turbines must be located at an adequate distance between them to avoid aerodynamic interference and two other most serious consequences: the increase in turbulence and the loss of power. The optimum spacing is set between 8 and 12 times the rotor diameter in the direction of the wind, and between 2 and 4 times in the direction perpendicular to the wind.

Words such as “shadow effect”, “performance” and “power loss” have been highlighted, all of them related to the efficiency of the turbines. However, spacing between wind turbines has not been discussed yet from the environmental point of view.

Decree 32/2006 of 27 March, which regulates the installation and operation of wind farms in the Canary Islands is an example of current laws regarding regulations of wind farms. Article 25 of this document focuses on potential distances from wind turbines to homes or other wind turbines. Section 2 of this article indicates that the minimum distance between two wind turbines in the same line will not be less than 2 rotor diameters, and the distance between two lines in the same park must be at least 5 rotor diameters. This regulation does not appear to be due to performance reasons but neither (we believe) to environmental issues.

Enviroment impact

Reviewing various Environmental Impact Statements of wind farm projects in which we have participated (exactly, 54), we found that the limitations on turbine spacing vary by territories within Spain. However, there are some common rules followed by most of them. For wind turbines on the same row, the distance between them will be 3 times the length of the rotor diameter. In the case of turbines on different rows, the spacing among then will be of 7 times the length of the rotor diameter. Since the same specific ratios are used in various Environmental Impact Statements, they could be defined as an “environmental standard”. However, we are not totally sure these ratios are based on environmental evidence, since they are probably based on the technical studies stated at the beginning of this post.

In order to obtain further information on this matter, we reviewed a large number of sources of information regarding the environmental impact of wind farms. However, we did not find any criteria for turbine distance placement intended to reduce the impact of windfarms on wildlife.

We also reviewed the publication titled:”Understanding bird collisions at wind farms: An updated review on the causes and possible mitigation strategies” (Marques et al. 2014), which states, based on literature review, that the positions of the wind turbines within a row did not influence the turbine fatality rate of Griffon vultures (Gyps fulvus) at Tarifa (Spain) (De Lucas et al. 2012). This publication also stated that the distance between turbines has increased in the last years since the newest wind turbines (3 MW machines with rotors of up to 125 m) require a larger minimum distance between adjacent turbines. Therefore, In New Wind Farms it is less likely that birds perceive rows of turbines as impenetrable walls. In fact, Cárcamo et al. 2011 found in Greece that the longer the distance between wind turbines, the higher is the probability that raptors will attempt to cross the space between them.

As a conclusion, when we try not to consider only wind turbine efficiency as a factor, we cannot find an evident environmental criterion to assess the optimal spacing between wind turbines. Nevertheless, all the experience obtained during the operating phase and the environmental monitoring of wind farms, as well as the general guidelines described in this post, should continue to govern the decisions of project designers, managers and evaluators.

We hope this lack of information regarding an environmental point of view will reopen the debate on turbine spacing and we could obtain further information we might not be aware of about this matter. In the meantime, we are adding this piece of knowledge to the post published in 2015 so people could check for compliance of equipment.

Ideas we share

What we really think. 0% spam contamination

Sustainability
5/5/25

Special Action Project: the urban key to Data Centers in the Community of Madrid

The Special Action Projects facilitate the implementation of data centers in Madrid. Discover how they overcome urban barriers.
Evaluation
Surveillance
Sustainability
30/4/25

Noise isn't good, but good doesn't make noise

On International Noise Awareness Day, we remember that reducing acoustic impact is key to protecting our health and biodiversity: you don't always have to make noise to get noticed, you just need to find the right sound.
Biodiversity
24/4/25

Invasive species and renewable energy

The expansion of invasive species threatens biodiversity. We analyze their impact, causes and how to prevent their progress in environmental projects.
Biodiversity
22/4/25

Mother Earth in the Eyes Kachiri

40 years ago, The Emerald Forest denounced the destruction of the Amazon. Today, the challenge of conserving biodiversity remains current and requires action.

Join the tribe. Work at Ideas Medioambientales.

Una oportunidad emocionante en el campo de la consultoría medioambiental. Trabaja en proyectos apasionantes que tienen un impacto positivo en el medio ambiente y la sostenibilidad. Únete al equipo y sé parte del cambio.